I subscribed to The Economist and read your article.
I am very glad to see that attention is being given to the matter of cherry-picking data, and that in the future there may be an incentive to make primary data and research methods publicly available.
Plagiarism has been a matter of great interest in the news lately, but misrepresenting research findings deserves just as much attention.
I subscribed to The Economist and read your article.
I am very glad to see that attention is being given to the matter of cherry-picking data, and that in the future there may be an incentive to make primary data and research methods publicly available.
Plagiarism has been a matter of great interest in the news lately, but misrepresenting research findings deserves just as much attention.
I subscribed to The Economist and read your article.
I am very glad to see that attention is being given to the matter of cherry-picking data, and that in the future there may be an incentive to make primary data and research methods publicly available.
Plagiarism has been a matter of great interest in the news lately, but misrepresenting research findings deserves just as much attention.