In a retrospective study that included the cohort of the original Dutch Protocol kids, about 20% discontinued identifying as the opposite gender too.
doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/…
https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdad062.088
Thanks for this study. I just read it, with interest.
You might want to read Abbruzzese et al, The Myth of reliable research in pediatric gender medicine... (2023).
There is also a paper by Biggs on the history of the Dutch protocol which talks about the younger kids a lot, too.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
In a retrospective study that included the cohort of the original Dutch Protocol kids, about 20% discontinued identifying as the opposite gender too.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdad062.088
Thanks for this study. I just read it, with interest.
You might want to read Abbruzzese et al, The Myth of reliable research in pediatric gender medicine... (2023).
There is also a paper by Biggs on the history of the Dutch protocol which talks about the younger kids a lot, too.