1 Comment
⭠ Return to thread

Thanks! The attorneys were pretty young, so this is probably the explanation. I will say that the defendant and the victim both had really sad life stories and that we still don't know why he killed the victim. I suspect it was for some incredibly small amount of money or drugs and maybe the attorneys were hoping to make something happen with that uncertainty. They generally didn't present a defense, but cross-examined a few witnesses and seemed to be poking around for evidence to suggest that the defendant's rights had been violated (they hadn't from what I observed). I asked them what they were looking for in jury selection (i.e. why didn't they try to make a jury of complete idiots) and it was interesting to hear what they were looking for.

I also was pretty excited to talk to them even though I wanted the trial to be over. I have so many questions and would've loved to talk to the DA, the judge, and all of the court officers too. Juries get a weird inside view of some aspects of the court system, but the information we had access to was very circumscribed.

Expand full comment