sure - but he has been a valuable contributor to a lot of discussions, whereas Michael Hobbes doesn't really meet that category. I think that the data contradicts what he says, and Weinstein is doing people a disservice by not reflecting on it and modifying, I really believe he has this conclusion laid-down in his brain as solidly as a m…
sure - but he has been a valuable contributor to a lot of discussions, whereas Michael Hobbes doesn't really meet that category. I think that the data contradicts what he says, and Weinstein is doing people a disservice by not reflecting on it and modifying, I really believe he has this conclusion laid-down in his brain as solidly as a memory at this point. It's effectively a "central dogma" he is working from. In issues not related to this one, I find him a useful contributor... never said that about Michael Hobbes.
sure - but he has been a valuable contributor to a lot of discussions, whereas Michael Hobbes doesn't really meet that category. I think that the data contradicts what he says, and Weinstein is doing people a disservice by not reflecting on it and modifying, I really believe he has this conclusion laid-down in his brain as solidly as a memory at this point. It's effectively a "central dogma" he is working from. In issues not related to this one, I find him a useful contributor... never said that about Michael Hobbes.